BRIDGELESS PFC IMPLEMENTATION USING ONE CYCLE CONTROL TECHNIQUE PDF
In this paper, One Cycle Control technique is implemented in the bridgeless PFC. By using one cycle control both the voltage sensing and current sensing. rectifier and power factor correction circuit to a single circuit, the output of which is double the voltage implementation of One Cycle Control required a better controller. . The figure shows a typical buck converter using PWM technique. PWM switching technique is used here as implementation of One Cycle Power Factor Correction, Bridgeless voltage Doubler, Buck Converter, One Cycle Control This problem can be solved by using bridgeless converters to reduce the.
|Published (Last):||26 February 2011|
|PDF File Size:||5.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.18 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This means that it has slow dynamic performance in regulating the output in response to the change in input voltage. The output of the integrator is compared with the reference in the comparator and the output of the comparator is used contro, set and resets the D flip flop.
The two inductor topology can be also replaced by using a single inductor at the middle so that same inductor can be made common to both the buck converters operating at positive and negative half. This drop of efficiency at low line can cause increased input current that produces higher losses in semiconductors and input EMI filter implekentation.
Since the reset signal is a pulse with very short width, the reset time pfx very short, and the integration is activated immediately after the resetting.
This method is a non linear control technique to control the duty ratio of the switch in real time such that in each half cycle the average value of the chopped waveform is made equal to the reference value.
Each converter is operating during positive and negative half cycle respectively. The simulation of bridgeless buck voltage doubler circuit using One Cycle Control was done in Matlab simulink and the waveforms obtained at the time of simulation is presented here. Switch mode power supplies without power factor correction will introduce harmonic content to the input current waveform which will ultimately results in a ising power factor and hence lower efficiency.
The output of the integrator is compared with the control reference in real time using a comparator.
One Cycle Control of Bridgeless Buck Converter
When switching pulses are given to one of the switches the other switch will be off. The error signal thus obtainedand saw tooth waveform is given as input to the comparator where it is compared is compared to generate the PWM signal for the switch.
When the integral value of Vo reaches the Vref ,the comparator changes its state from low to high which is indicated by a short pulse as shown in the graph. In pulse width modulation PWM control, the duty ratio is linearly modulated in a direction so as to reduces the error.
Power Electronics Europe, No. In PWM control, the duty ratio pulses are produced by comparing control reference signal with a saw-tooth signal. When integral value Vint reaches the control reference,Vref comparator changes its state and turns the switch transistor off and the integrator is reset to zero at the same time. Abstract To reduce the rectifier bridge conduction loss, different topologies have been developed.
The results obtained are also presented in this paper. An additional advantage of the proposed circuit is its inrush current control capability. A large number of switching cycles are also required to attain the steady state. The output is always influenced by the input voltage perturbation. The voltage available at the output is double the voltage across each capacitor. The input voltage and current waveforms, gating signals and the output obtained are shown.
The simulation is done at a switching frequency of 65kHz.
Bridgeless PFC Implementation Using One CycleControl Technique
Don’t have an account? This also eliminates any variation of the input supply voltage and provides a dynamic performance. The one-cycle controller is comprised of an integrator with reset, a comparator, a flip-flop, a clock and an adder.
The voltage output Vo is compared with Vref to generate an error signal and it is amplified. The values of inductors and capacitor is designed to obtain an output of 12 V DC. The bridgeless buck converter was designed for an output voltage of 12V dc. Any change in the input voltage must be sensed as an output voltage change and error produced in the output voltage is used to change the duty ratio to keep the output voltage constant.
At the same time, since the AC side inductor structure makes the output floating regarding the input line, the circuit suffers from high common mode noise. Thus it is important to identify whether the incoming waveform is from the positive half or from the negative half.
At the same time EMI results show that the circuit noise is controllable. The total output obtained is the sum of voltage across each capacitor of the buck converters which are operating during positive and negative half respectively. Here Ts is the time period of one switching cycle. This circuit consists of two buck converters connected in parallel in series out manner. The output obtained is amplified and is fed to an integrator with reset.
The gating signals given to the switches during the positive and negative half cycle, onee and the output waveforms obtained during the simulation are shown below.
One Cycle Control of Bridgeless Buck Converter | Open Access Journals
As long as the area under the diode-voltage waveform in each cycle is the same as the control reference signal, instantaneous control of the diode-voltage is achieved. The clock triggers the RS flip-flop to turn ON the transistor with a constant frequency. Therefore, one cycle control gives an attractive solution for the bridgeless PFC pne. At each instant the integral value is being compared with a reference Vref.
Constant Power supply required for the implemdntation and the driver is provided using separate DC source. When the switch is turned on by a fixed frequency clock pulse, voltage available across the diode is being integrated. G1 and G2 shows the gating signals generated by the ptc cycle controller which is used to control the switching operation of S1 and S2. One-Cycle Control method  reject input voltage perturbations in only one switching cycle and follow the control reference very quickly.
This paper explains a new control method called One Cycle Control  which is a non linear control technique and produce faster response than the later one. The clock triggers the RS flip-flop to turn ON the transistor with a constant frequency. The results obtained during the hardware implementation are presented below. Then the error produced in the output voltage is amplified and compared with the saw tooth signal to control the duty ratio pulses.
The PWM control method which was already used for controlling the switching has been studied and analysed in this paper using suitable waveforms.